Lumen 22-1
European Dominance
January 15, 2022
Europe
has dominated the world in many ways, starting in the Middle Ages when European
explorers and sailors spread out across the planet, finding “new” places. Of course,
the world was not lost so you can’t accurately say that Europeans found Africa
or America, but they did incorporate these places, that were previously unknown
to them, into the European culture (Table 1).
Europe
was better than anyone else in war weapons and travel, in part because of their
expertise in |
Columbus "discovering" America |
metallurgy, gun powder, ship design, and navigation as
demonstrated by the invention and use of the sextant. These technological advances, an attitude committed
to dominating the people living in their “discovered” lands. and the drive to make
money resulted in European explorers conquering lands and their inhabitants everywhere
they explored. Also, Europeans strongly
felt that their culture, religion, and way-of-life was vastly superior than
anyone else’s. And certainty much better
than the life styles of the “primitive” people they encountered throughout the
non-European world. They considered
themselves better than everyone else and so they deserved to be dominant. Are Europeans superior? was question that was
not even asked in their progress toward conquering and subjugating the rest of the
planet.
Europeans
approached this colonial world domination on several fronts: military,
transportation, economic, disease, and spiritual. I will address the spiritual aspect in Lumen
22-2 on Missionaries.
Military – Superior Weapon
Technology - Gunpowder and the weapons it spawned were a tremendous |
Cortez and troops
|
advantage
for the Europeans. Many future colonies
did not have any idea how to fight against these powerful new-to-them weapons. The good example is how Hernán Cortés conquered
the Aztec Empire, which flourished between 1325 and 1521, in less than two
years. Cortez’s Spanish conquistadors arrived in Mexico
with steel swords, muskets, cannons, pikes, crossbows, war dogs, and horses - none
of these assets had yet been used in battle in the Americas. The Aztecs fought back with wooden broadswords,
clubs, and spears tipped with obsidian blades: weapons that proved to be ineffective
against the conquistadors’ metal armor and shields.
Great
Britain is the all-time leader (a GOAT) in occupying areas and forming colonies at
90 (Table 2), including large colonies like Canada, Australia, and India. Great Britain used locally fermented
disagreements to start proxy wars or to take advantage of on-going wars while providing
enough help to assure that their side would win. This reduced their military presence and the
cost of ruling and controlling their colonies
Transportation – Big Ships –
While the Polynesians mastered transoceanic travel, they did not have the
capacity to regularly travel in both directions between islands i.e., establish
trade. Compared to other boats at the
time, the European boats were big, big enough to hold both people and trade
goods. This enabled the colonies to
maintain contact with the home country, which was valuable both for trade and military
resupply. After the invention of the sextant,
they even knew where they were going.
Economic – Big Companies –
Making money was always a critical part of European exploration. First through the search for treasure, i.e.,
finding golden cites, and some of this was successful, especially for Spain. However, the more established and longer
lasting way to get rich is through for-profit companies, and these companies
can also contribute toward control of a potential new colony. In many cases these companies were formally endorsed
and formed by the mother country.
Businesses
that helped conquer nations include the:
Dutch East India Company, Hudson’s Bay Company, and English East India
Company.
In
1602 the Dutch government sponsored the creation of the Dutch East India
Company in an effort |
Dutch East India Co. logo
|
to stabilize profits in the Dutch spice trade and form
a monopoly. At its height, the Dutch
East India Company established headquarters in many different countries, had a
monopoly over the spice trade, and had semi-governmental powers in that it was
able to begin wars, prosecute convicts, negotiate treaties, and establish
colonies. By 1669 the Dutch East India
Company was the richest company in the world.
In
the 21st century the Hudson's Bay Company is a Canadian, now
American-owned, retail business group that owns and operates retail stores in
Canada and the United States. However, it started as a fur trading business and
at its peak controlled the fur trade throughout much of the British-controlled
North America.
|
Hudson Bay Co. logo
|
A
royal charter from King Charles II in 1670 granted the company a monopoly over
the region drained by all rivers and streams flowing into Hudson Bay in
northern parts of present-day Canada (known as Rupert’s Land). The company functioned as the de facto
government in parts of North America for nearly 200 years until it sold its land
to Canada in 1869.
The
English East India Company was formed by royal charter in 1600 to trade
in the Indian Ocean |
English East India Co. logo
|
region, and in the process of doing business, it seized
control of large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonized parts of Southeast
Asia and Hong Kong, and maintained trading posts and colonies in the Persian
Gulf. The company rose to account for half
of the world's trade during the mid-1700s and early 1800s, particularly in
basic commodities including cotton, silk, indigo dye, sugar, salt, spices, saltpeter,
tea, and opium.
During
the beginnings of the British Empire in India, the company came to rule large
areas of India, exercising military power, and assuming administrative functions. Company rule in India effectively began in
1757 and lasted until 1858 when the Government of India Act led to the British
Crown assuming direct control of India in the form of the new British Raj.
Disease – Accidental and
Otherwise – When Europeans first started to explore the Americas, Sub-Saharan Africa,
Australia, and the Pacific islands they did not know that they were introducing
killer diseases to these “new” lands. Lacking
immunity to Old World pathogens carried by the Europeans, indigenous inhabitants
fell victim to terrible plagues of smallpox, influenza, and other viruses. Disease alone did not cause population
reductions, but was complimented with the disruption of native communities, brutal
forced labor, and malnutrition.
“Much of the credit for European
military success in the New World can be handed to the superiority of their weapons, their literary heritage, even the fact
they had unique load- bearing
mammals, like horses. These factors combined, gave the conquistadors a massive advantage over the sophisticated civilisations
of the Aztec and Inca empires.
But weapons alone can't account for
the breathtaking speed with which the indigenous population of the New World were completely wiped out.
Within just a few generations, the
continents of the Americas were virtually emptied of their native inhabitants – some academics estimate that
approximately 20 million people may
have died in the years following the European invasion – up to 95% of the population of the Americas.
No medieval force, no matter how
bloodthirsty, could have achieved such enormous levels of genocide. Instead, Europeans were aided by a deadly
secret weapon they weren't even aware
they were carrying: Smallpox.” (This is
quoted from “Guns, Germs, and Steel”
by Jared Diamond. If you are interested
in the why’s and wherefores of human social
and economic development, I highly recommend this book.)
Not
all historians agree with Diamond’s blanket statements that population
reductions were universal in the Americas.
Instead, they conclude that, even though Europeans brought chickenpox, smallpox,
measles, mumps, and rubella to the new world, epidemic disease was a patchwork
affair, striking some populations and not others at various times. Some studies show that although rapid
population loss and extinction occurred in some areas, many groups survived and
accommodated new and challenging circumstances.
However,
there are some striking case histories of disease-caused population declines. 1) In
April 1520, Spanish forces landed in what is now Veracruz, Mexico, unwittingly
bringing along an African slave infected with smallpox. Two months later, Hernan Cortez’s troops
entered the capital of the Aztec Empire, Tenochtitlán, and by mid-October a
virus was sweeping through the city, killing nearly half of the population,
which scholars estimate at 50,000 to 300,000 people. 2) In the late 1770s or early 1780s, a smallpox epidemic
spread through the entire Pacific northwest.
The most likely mode of entry was from two infected men left behind by a
ship off the northern Oregon coast.
Members of the 1804-05 Lewis and Clark expedition commented on the prevalence
of pockmarked natives and long abandoned villages. Native informants told of widespread
mortality. From the North Coast Haida
chief Kowes said “the small Pox swept off two-thirds of the people,” and from
the lower Columbia “the Clatsops inform us that this disorder raged in their
towns and destroyed their nation.”
Population
Reduction Causes? Global Cooling.
Researchers
from University College London found that after the rapid population decline in
the Americas, large swaths of vegetation and farmland were abandoned. When this previously farmed land in North and
South America — equal to an area almost the size of France — was reforested by
trees and flora, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels dropped. Antarctic ice cores dating back to the late
1500’s and 1600’s confirm that decrease in carbon dioxide. That drop in carbon dioxide levels was enough
to lower global temperatures by 0.15 degrees Celsius and contribute to the
global cooling trend called the "Little Ice Age," during which
glaciers expanded.
Initially
the weapon of disease was not well recognized by Europeans, nor intentionally
used in the early colonial contacts. In
later times, especially the 19th century, disease was sometimes allowed to do
its damage or was purposefully introduced into indigenous populations. During the Seven Years' War in 1763, British Colonel
Henry Bouquet recommended to General Jeffrey Amherst to distribute smallpox infected
blankets to "inocculate the Indians".
Amherst approved this plan and suggested as well "to try Every
other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race." Legends and written documents indicate that
many Europeans were using smallpox as a weapon.
In
1832 the U.S. government approved smallpox vaccinations for Native
Americans. However, the Secretary of War
notified the Western Indian Agent not to vaccinate on the Missouri River above
the Arikara villages, near present-day Pierre, SD. In 1837 the American Fur Company’s (owned by
John Jacob Astor) steamboat St. Peters went up the Missouri River with smallpox-contaminated
passengers. People getting off at Indian
trading posts quickly spread an epidemic.
Most of the tribes suffered 60 percent population loss and the Mandan
suffered a 90 percent loss. This event
has always been controversial and it is not clear that genocide was the
intention. Some say blankets were
intentionally contaminated, others blame the edict by the Secretary of War five
years earlier. It is believed that only
40-150 Mandan survived the smallpox scourge and survivors had to seek refuge
with the Hidatsa.
Disease
increases caused by European domination was not only a problem in the Americas.
“The African way of life was
designed to avoid mosquito-borne infection. Africans made their homes in high, dry areas when
they could, away from the natural habitat of the mosquito. Also, African communities remained fairly small, which
limited the level of disease transmission.
Unfortunately, the arrival of
colonizing Europeans, with their steam trains, machine guns and dreams of industrial wealth, wreaked
terrible damage on these centuries-old mechanisms
of survival. Torn from their villages, forced to live and work together in massive numbers and in unsanitary
conditions, tropical Africans fell ill as never before. The scourge of malaria throughout Africa today is, in part, the
consequence of the destruction of a way
of life which had existed for thousands of years.” (Guns, Germs, and Steel)
So,
the Europeans had superior guns, ships, and economic organization which enabled
them to dominate other parts of the world.
These were the proximate reasons for their ability dominate, but a
better question is why did the Europeans have these advantages and other parts
of the world did not? Why did American Indians not have big ships? Why did Africans not have steel rifles? I will not address this question here but once
more refer you to “Gun, Germs, and Steel” for an excellent investigation of the
long term reasons that Europeans were able to dominate the rest of the world.
Table 1 - A very rough
measure of colonial activity
European #
Areas
Country Ruled*
Great Britain 90
France 77
Spain 34
Holland 19
Germany 18
Portugal 16
Russia 9
Italy 4
Denmark 4
Sweden 3
Belgium 1
* various levels of control
for various
lengths of time
Oceania
Wake
Island – Ruled by US, but not any European country.
Africa
Liberia
Asia
Afghanistan
Bhutan
Most
of China
Iran
Japan
Korea
- Russia briefly held North Korea
Mongolia
- Heavy Russian influence
Nepal
Thailand
Tibet
- Part of China
Turkey
- Turkey was part of the Roman Empire and is partially in Europe.
Notice
that all of North America, South America, and Australia was under the rule of a
European country at one time during their history. In Africa, only Liberia has totally avoided
European control. Under an international
treaty agreement, signed by 12 countries in 1959 with 54 signees today, no part
of Antarctica is controlled by any country, but the world was busy splitting it
up before the treaty. Consequently, even today seven countries, who are all signatories
to the treaty, (Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway, and
the United Kingdom) maintain territorial claims in Antarctica, but the United
States and most other countries do not recognize those claims. The United States maintains a basis to claim
territory in Antarctica, it has not made a claim.
Comments
Post a Comment